国产h视频在线观看,99视频精品全部 国产,色欲综合久久中文字幕网,国产AV熟妇人震精品一品二区,欧美做爰片高潮视频大尺度

VIP標識歡迎光(guang)臨種業商務網(wang) | |
商務中心
商務中(zhong)心
發布信息
發布信(xin)息
排名推廣
排名(ming)推廣(guang)
 
當前位置: 首頁 » 資訊 » 推薦閱讀 » 正文

又一侵害植物新品種權案塵埃落定,最高人民法院維持一審原判!

放大字體  縮小字體 發布日期:2021-12-30  來源:最高人民法院  瀏覽次數:1032
 
       上訴人四川綠丹至誠種業有限公司(以下簡稱綠丹公司)因與上訴人瀘州泰豐種業有限公司(以下簡稱泰豐公司)侵害植物新品種權糾紛一案,不服四川省成都市中級人民法院于2019年12月20日作出的(2018)川01民初1217號民事判決,向最高人民法院提起上訴。最高人民法院于2020年5月20日立案后,依法組成合議庭,并于2020年6月16日公開開庭審理了本案,上訴人綠丹公司委托訴訟代理人肖敬雙、陳威臣,上訴人泰豐公司委托訴訟代理人任曉東、涂愛國到庭參加訴訟。本案現已審理終結。

      綠丹公司向原審法院提起訴訟,原審法院于2018年3月23日立案受理,綠丹公司起訴請求:1.判令泰豐公司立即停止侵害即停止繁殖、銷售與綠丹公司享有的“宜香優2115”的品種權相同的種子的行為;2.判令泰豐公司立即將庫存侵害“宜香優2115”品種權的稻種全部銷毀;3.判令泰豐公司向綠丹公司賠償損失300萬元(含綠丹公司制止侵權行為的合理開支379014.6元);4.判令泰豐公司在《中國種業》《農資財富雜志》上刊登公開聲明,消除侵權影響。事實與理由:由省綠丹公司、四川農業大學農學院、宜賓市農業科學院聯合選育的“宜香優2115”于2012年12月24日通過農業部國家農作物品種審定委員會審定,又于2011年5月9日向農業部植物新品種保護辦公室申請植物新品種保護,于2016年3月1日獲得了植物新品種權(品種權號CNA20110346.6)。2015年3月9日,綠丹公司從宜賓市農業科學院、四川農業大學、省綠丹公司處獲得“宜香優2115”獨占生產、經營權以及“宜香優2115”市場維護、維權打假的權利。2017年初,綠丹公司在維權打假過程中發現,泰豐公司在未經權利人同意的情況下,銷售侵害“宜香優2115”稻種的行為,雙方進行了協商達成和解。后綠丹公司在2018年打假維權過程中又發現泰豐公司將“宜香優2115”繁殖材料套用至“宜香優5979”,構成二次侵權。故為維護綠丹公司合法權益,訴諸于法律,望判如所請。

      泰豐公司原審答辯:1.綠丹公司訴訟主體不適格,《植物新品種“宜香優2115”獨占生產、經營權授權書》(以下簡稱《授權書》)是簽訂于2015年3月9日,而“宜香優2115”獲得品種權授權是2016年3月1日,《授權書》是倒簽形成,綠丹公司也沒有提供證據證明其在2016年3月1日后是否獲得授權以及準確的時間,故綠丹公司不是本案適格主體。2.品種權人省綠丹公司自2015年以來陷入巨額標的訴訟中,省綠丹公司為了逃避債務,在法院強制執行期間將品種權以倒簽方式獨占轉讓給綠丹公司,該轉讓行為應屬無效,綠丹公司取得的授權不能作為其進行品種維權的依據。3.綠丹公司提交的湖南省農業科學院農作物雜交種子質量檢測中心出具的《水稻品種DNA真實性檢測結果》文件不具有法律效力,綠丹公司將自行購買的種子送檢,其購買和送檢程序不符合規定,鑒定機構不具有農業部規定的檢測資質,故鑒定報告不具有證明力。4.綠丹公司在2018年2-3月曾向多地農業執法部門進行舉報,農業執法部門將泰豐公司的種子進行了封存,上述封存樣品經過瀘州市農業局送檢,其檢測結果顯示與“宜香優2115”非同一品種,故泰豐公司不存在侵權行為。5.法院委托鑒定機構依據綠丹公司送檢樣品出具的檢驗報告存在樣品來源不清的問題,公證機關的公證過程存在明顯漏洞和瑕疵,公證書所述申請公證的時間和采取公證的時間為同一天且早上9點就到了購買店鋪的現場,公證處沒有合理的審查申請人資格的時間,同時(2018)川成蜀證內民字第13979號公證書所附圖片及相關“定金收條”、種子銷售憑證均不是泰豐公司的種子銷售憑證或發票,不能證明是易衛東在公證員陪同或監督下購買了種子,不能證明該種子為泰豐公司所銷售,故對公證封存的種子來源不予認可。6.2017年雙方簽訂的《和解協議》不能作為本案證據,該和解是因為當地制種農戶將政府采購未播種的“宜香優2115”種子拆袋后當作當年生產的“宜香優1577”種子交售給了泰豐公司,泰豐公司當時不知情,該和解與本案無關,不能作為本案的事實。7.泰豐公司沒有侵權行為,不應承擔侵權責任,綠丹公司請求的賠償金額300萬元缺乏事實和法律依據。綜上,請求駁回綠丹公司的訴訟請求。

      原審法院認為,本(ben)案(an)的爭議焦點(dian)是(shi):(一)綠丹公(gong)司(si)是(shi)否(fou)有(you)權提起本(ben)案(an)訴訟;(二)泰(tai)豐公(gong)司(si)是(shi)否(fou)侵(qin)害了(le)綠丹公(gong)司(si)“宜香優(you)2115”新品種權;(三)泰(tai)豐公(gong)司(si)的民事責任。

      (一)綠丹公司是否有權提起本(ben)案訴訟

      綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)認可(ke)《授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)書》形成時間(jian)晚于(yu)(yu)授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)書載明(ming)的(de)(de)(de)2015年3月9日,泰(tai)豐公(gong)(gong)司(si)據此(ci)(ci)認為由于(yu)(yu)授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)委托書系“倒簽”形成,因(yin)此(ci)(ci)不(bu)發(fa)生將涉案(an)品(pin)種權(quan)獨占(zhan)(zhan)許(xu)可(ke)給綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)的(de)(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)(fa)律效(xiao)力(li),綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)無權(quan)提(ti)(ti)起(qi)本(ben)案(an)訴(su)訟。原(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)院認為,綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)是否(fou)獲得了(le)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)(de)(de)獨占(zhan)(zhan)許(xu)可(ke)取(qu)決于(yu)(yu)是否(fou)獲得了(le)權(quan)利(li)人的(de)(de)(de)授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan),在本(ben)案(an)起(qi)訴(su)之(zhi)前綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)已經(jing)獲得了(le)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”權(quan)利(li)人的(de)(de)(de)授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan),至于(yu)(yu)倒簽的(de)(de)(de)時間(jian)是綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)和權(quan)利(li)人對于(yu)(yu)其(qi)雙(shuang)方授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)開始時間(jian)的(de)(de)(de)確認,并不(bu)影響授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)本(ben)身的(de)(de)(de)真(zhen)實性(xing)。依據《最高人民法(fa)(fa)(fa)院關于(yu)(yu)審(shen)理侵(qin)犯植(zhi)物新品(pin)種權(quan)糾紛案(an)件具體應用法(fa)(fa)(fa)律問題的(de)(de)(de)若干規定》第一條第三(san)款規定“獨占(zhan)(zhan)實施(shi)許(xu)可(ke)合同的(de)(de)(de)被許(xu)可(ke)人可(ke)以(yi)單獨向人民法(fa)(fa)(fa)院提(ti)(ti)起(qi)訴(su)訟”,“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”權(quan)利(li)人在授(shou)(shou)(shou)權(quan)書中明(ming)確許(xu)可(ke)綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)獨占(zhan)(zhan)行使“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)(de)(de)生產(chan)、經(jing)營、市場維護(hu)、維權(quan)打假等(deng)相應權(quan)利(li),因(yin)此(ci)(ci)綠(lv)(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)有(you)權(quan)提(ti)(ti)起(qi)本(ben)案(an)訴(su)訟,原(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)院對泰(tai)豐公(gong)(gong)司(si)的(de)(de)(de)主張不(bu)予支(zhi)持。

      (二)泰豐公司是否侵害了綠丹公司“宜香優2115”新(xin)品種權

      本案中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong),綠(lv)丹(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)向蜀(shu)都公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)處(chu)申請(qing)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)保(bao)全、固定(ding)(ding)四川省多(duo)處(chu)被(bei)訴侵權(quan)(quan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”水稻種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)。對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)于(yu)(yu)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)在(zai)庭(ting)(ting)審中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)以(yi)及(ji)庭(ting)(ting)后書(shu)面提(ti)交(jiao)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)關(guan)于(yu)(yu)(2018)川成蜀(shu)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)內民(min)字(zi)第13979號公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)瑕疵(ci)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)抗辯意見(jian)(jian),原(yuan)審法(fa)院認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei),在(zai)庭(ting)(ting)前的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)據交(jiao)換及(ji)聽證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong),泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)明確認(ren)(ren)可(ke)(2018)川成蜀(shu)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)內民(min)字(zi)第13979號公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)保(bao)全的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)系(xi)(xi)其(qi)生(sheng)(sheng)產,在(zai)庭(ting)(ting)審過程中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)也(ye)(ye)認(ren)(ren)可(ke)該(gai)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)購(gou)買種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)門店(dian)確系(xi)(xi)其(qi)經(jing)銷(xiao)(xiao)商,公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)機關(guan)內檔(dang)資料及(ji)出具(ju)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)情況說明能夠合理解釋公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)存在(zai)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)時間(jian)沖(chong)突問題,公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)取證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)本質只是(shi)(shi)(shi)對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)特定(ding)(ding)時間(jian)發生(sheng)(sheng)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)特定(ding)(ding)事(shi)實的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)一(yi)(yi)個(ge)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)明,不論是(shi)(shi)(shi)代(dai)理人資格(ge)還是(shi)(shi)(shi)維權(quan)(quan)資格(ge)都是(shi)(shi)(shi)當(dang)事(shi)人基于(yu)(yu)該(gai)事(shi)實采(cai)取維權(quan)(quan)行(xing)為(wei)(wei)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)階(jie)段需要證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)明的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)內容(rong),且蜀(shu)都公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)處(chu)出具(ju)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)說明中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)電話申請(qing)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)律(lv)師是(shi)(shi)(shi)本案綠(lv)丹(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)委(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)訴訟(song)代(dai)理人,綠(lv)丹(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)經(jing)原(yuan)審法(fa)院審查也(ye)(ye)具(ju)備了(le)相應(ying)(ying)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)維權(quan)(quan)資格(ge),在(zai)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)沒有提(ti)交(jiao)其(qi)他證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)據推翻公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)記載的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)事(shi)實的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)前提(ti)下,泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)抗辯意見(jian)(jian)不能成立(li),故(gu)原(yuan)審法(fa)院對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)其(qi)主張(zhang)(zhang)該(gai)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)不是(shi)(shi)(shi)其(qi)生(sheng)(sheng)產、銷(xiao)(xiao)售的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)意見(jian)(jian)不予(yu)采(cai)納。泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)于(yu)(yu)原(yuan)審法(fa)院委(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)深圳中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心做出的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”和(he)(he)(he)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”未檢(jian)測出位點(dian)差異的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)結(jie)論予(yu)以(yi)認(ren)(ren)可(ke),但是(shi)(shi)(shi)認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)因(yin)為(wei)(wei)瀘州市(shi)農(nong)業局(ju)對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)同(tong)一(yi)(yi)批(pi)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)也(ye)(ye)進行(xing)了(le)送檢(jian),鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)論是(shi)(shi)(shi)有18個(ge)差異位點(dian),故(gu)由(you)于(yu)(yu)鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)論的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)不唯(wei)一(yi)(yi),不能依據法(fa)院委(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)深圳中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心做出的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)結(jie)論認(ren)(ren)定(ding)(ding)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”侵權(quan)(quan)。對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)此原(yuan)審法(fa)院認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei),鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)論能否被(bei)采(cai)納的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)關(guan)鍵,在(zai)于(yu)(yu)鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)各(ge)個(ge)重要環節都處(chu)于(yu)(yu)利害關(guan)系(xi)(xi)人的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)“注(zhu)視(shi)”下,即(ji)各(ge)利害關(guan)系(xi)(xi)人對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)于(yu)(yu)檢(jian)材(cai)(cai)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)確定(ding)(ding)、鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)機構的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)選取、鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)方法(fa)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)確定(ding)(ding)等(deng)事(shi)項都進行(xing)了(le)參與并充分發表意見(jian)(jian),從(cong)而保(bao)障鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)論的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)立(li)和(he)(he)(he)客觀。從(cong)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)提(ti)交(jiao)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)由(you)瀘州市(shi)農(nong)業局(ju)送檢(jian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(2018)農(nong)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)檢(jian)報(bao)(bao)(bao)字(zi)第69號、(2018)農(nong)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)檢(jian)報(bao)(bao)(bao)字(zi)第70號鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告及(ji)書(shu)面回復材(cai)(cai)料來看,其(qi)送檢(jian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)5979”來源(yuan)于(yu)(yu)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)庫存或銷(xiao)(xiao)售網(wang)點(dian),非來源(yuan)于(yu)(yu)本案公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)(zheng)購(gou)買的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)銷(xiao)(xiao)售網(wang)點(dian),“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”來源(yuan)于(yu)(yu)綠(lv)丹(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)庫存,無法(fa)確定(ding)(ding)其(qi)送檢(jian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)和(he)(he)(he)本案被(bei)訴侵權(quan)(quan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)以(yi)及(ji)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”具(ju)有一(yi)(yi)一(yi)(yi)對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)應(ying)(ying)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)關(guan)系(xi)(xi),故(gu)對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)上(shang)述(shu)鑒(jian)(jian)(jian)定(ding)(ding)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告不予(yu)采(cai)信。根據原(yuan)審法(fa)院委(wei)(wei)托(tuo)(tuo)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)深圳中(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)心作(zuo)出的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(2019)農(nong)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)檢(jian)報(bao)(bao)(bao)字(zi)第0066號檢(jian)驗報(bao)(bao)(bao)告,泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)生(sheng)(sheng)產、銷(xiao)(xiao)售的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”號水稻和(he)(he)(he)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”相同(tong),因(yin)此原(yuan)審法(fa)院對(dui)(dui)(dui)(dui)于(yu)(yu)綠(lv)丹(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)主張(zhang)(zhang)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)生(sheng)(sheng)產、銷(xiao)(xiao)售了(le)侵害其(qi)植物新品種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)繁殖材(cai)(cai)料的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)主張(zhang)(zhang)予(yu)以(yi)支(zhi)持。

      (三)泰豐公司的(de)民事責任以及賠償金額(e)

      關于民事責任問題。泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)侵害了綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)“宜(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優2115”獨占實施許可權(quan)(quan)(quan),故原(yuan)審(shen)法院對于綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)請求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)判(pan)令(ling)泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)立即停止繁殖、銷(xiao)售與“宜(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優2115”品(pin)種權(quan)(quan)(quan)相同的(de)(de)種子(zi)的(de)(de)訴求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)予(yu)以(yi)支持。綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)未(wei)有相關證(zheng)據(ju)證(zheng)明(ming)泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)留有侵權(quan)(quan)(quan)種子(zi)庫存,故原(yuan)審(shen)法院對于綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)請求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)判(pan)令(ling)泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)將庫存侵犯“宜(yi)(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優2115”品(pin)種權(quan)(quan)(quan)稻種全部銷(xiao)毀的(de)(de)訴求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)不予(yu)支持。綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)未(wei)提(ti)供(gong)證(zheng)據(ju)證(zheng)明(ming)其(qi)因泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)侵權(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)為給其(qi)造成了不良(liang)影(ying)響,故原(yuan)審(shen)法院對于綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)請求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)判(pan)令(ling)泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)在(zai)《中(zhong)國種業》和《農資(zi)財富(fu)雜志》上(shang)刊(kan)登(deng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)開聲明(ming)消(xiao)除侵權(quan)(quan)(quan)影(ying)響的(de)(de)訴求(qiu)(qiu)(qiu)不予(yu)支持。

      關于金額賠償(chang)問題(ti)。由于“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”和“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”經審(shen)定(ding)(ding)(ding)適宜推廣的(de)(de)(de)區域完全一致(zhi),因此(ci)前者的(de)(de)(de)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang)結(jie)合后者的(de)(de)(de)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)利潤(run)(run)基本(ben)(ben)(ben)可(ke)以推算(suan)出(chu)綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)的(de)(de)(de)損失(shi)范(fan)圍。從綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)提交的(de)(de)(de)農(nong)業農(nong)村部(bu)種子(zi)管(guan)理(li)(li)局上的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”2017-2018年備(bei)案(an)(an)(an)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)的(de)(de)(de)情(qing)況來(lai)看,泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”總共備(bei)案(an)(an)(an)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)33946公(gong)斤(jin),本(ben)(ben)(ben)案(an)(an)(an)中綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)主(zhu)張“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”種子(zi)利潤(run)(run)為(wei)36元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)每公(gong)斤(jin),即使按此(ci)利潤(run)(run)計算(suan),泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)在2017、2018年備(bei)案(an)(an)(an)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”水稻種子(zi)最多獲利1222056元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)。考(kao)慮到“宜香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”確(que)(que)系(xi)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)擁有獨占(zhan)許(xu)可(ke)權(quan)的(de)(de)(de)品種,且(qie)備(bei)案(an)(an)(an)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)的(de)(de)(de)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang)并不一定(ding)(ding)(ding)全部(bu)實(shi)際銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)完畢(bi),因此(ci)原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)院結(jie)合泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)的(de)(de)(de)侵(qin)權(quan)情(qing)節酌情(qing)確(que)(que)定(ding)(ding)(ding)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)賠償(chang)綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)損失(shi)70萬元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)。綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)在本(ben)(ben)(ben)案(an)(an)(an)中還主(zhu)張了(le)合理(li)(li)開支(zhi)379014.6元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan),結(jie)合本(ben)(ben)(ben)案(an)(an)(an)審(shen)理(li)(li)查明的(de)(de)(de)事(shi)實(shi)以及綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)代理(li)(li)律(lv)師(shi)訴訟(song)準(zhun)備(bei)和庭審(shen)工作的(de)(de)(de)具體情(qing)況,原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)院酌定(ding)(ding)(ding)確(que)(que)定(ding)(ding)(ding)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)賠償(chang)綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)為(wei)本(ben)(ben)(ben)案(an)(an)(an)支(zhi)出(chu)的(de)(de)(de)公(gong)證費、律(lv)師(shi)費80000元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)。因綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)(si)購買侵(qin)權(quan)產品的(de)(de)(de)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang)較大,部(bu)分地(di)點購買的(de)(de)(de)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang)明顯超(chao)出(chu)了(le)維(wei)權(quan)所需的(de)(de)(de)合理(li)(li)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang),因此(ci)原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)院按照其購買的(de)(de)(de)侵(qin)權(quan)產品的(de)(de)(de)單價以每個(ge)銷(xiao)售(shou)(shou)(shou)(shou)點三件(jian)的(de)(de)(de)數(shu)(shu)量(liang)(liang)支(zhi)持其購買侵(qin)權(quan)產品的(de)(de)(de)合理(li)(li)費用為(wei)1044元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)。

      綜上,原審法院判決(jue):(一)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)于本判決(jue)生效后立即停止繁(fan)殖、銷售侵(qin)害綠(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)“宜香優2115”植物(wu)新品(pin)種(zhong)權的(de)繁(fan)殖材料的(de)行(xing)為;(二)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)于判決(jue)生效之日(ri)起(qi)十日(ri)內賠償綠(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)經濟損(sun)失(shi)700000元(yuan)以及(ji)公(gong)證費(fei)(fei)、律師費(fei)(fei)、侵(qin)權種(zhong)子購買費(fei)(fei)用(yong)等合(he)理開支81044元(yuan),共計781044元(yuan);(三(san))駁(bo)回綠(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)其他訴訟請求。如果未按判決(jue)指定的(de)期間履行(xing)給付金錢(qian)義務,應當依照(zhao)《中華人民(min)共和(he)國(guo)民(min)事訴訟法》第二百五十三(san)條之規定,加倍支付遲延履行(xing)期間的(de)債務利息。案件受理費(fei)(fei)30800元(yuan),鑒定費(fei)(fei)2200元(yuan),財產保全費(fei)(fei)5000元(yuan),由泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)負(fu)擔。

      綠丹公司不服(fu)一審判決(jue),遂向最高人民法院提(ti)起上訴(su)。

      綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)上訴(su)請(qing)求:1.判(pan)令(ling)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)向(xiang)綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)賠償損失300萬元(含合理(li)開支);2.判(pan)令(ling)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)在國家級報刊(kan)(kan)、雜志(《中國種業(ye)》和《農(nong)資財富》)上刊(kan)(kan)登公(gong)(gong)(gong)開聲明,消(xiao)除(chu)侵(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)影響;3.判(pan)令(ling)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)承擔(dan)本案上訴(su)案件受(shou)理(li)費。事實與理(li)由:(一(yi))原(yuan)審判(pan)決(jue)確定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)賠償金(jin)額顯著(zhu)偏低。泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)在侵(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)過程(cheng)中獲利近千萬,而綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)實際(ji)損失也遠超300萬元,即便按照原(yuan)審判(pan)決(jue)邏輯,在判(pan)決(jue)過程(cheng)中也未充分(fen)考(kao)慮泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)再次侵(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)的(de)(de)(de)惡性以(yi)及(ji)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”的(de)(de)(de)巨大影響力,同時對(dui)綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)維權(quan)(quan)(quan)所支付的(de)(de)(de)合理(li)費用(yong)作(zuo)出不當調減(jian)導致(zhi)判(pan)賠數(shu)額顯著(zhu)偏低,懇(ken)請(qing)二(er)審法院充分(fen)考(kao)慮涉案因(yin)素,依(yi)法對(dui)泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)侵(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)行為予以(yi)適當的(de)(de)(de)懲處,在原(yuan)審判(pan)決(jue)的(de)(de)(de)基礎上,進(jin)一(yi)步提高判(pan)賠數(shu)額。(二(er))泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)侵(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)行為客觀上增加了“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”的(de)(de)(de)影響范圍(wei),在泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)出售的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”產量及(ji)品質(zhi)表現與綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)享有(you)權(quan)(quan)(quan)利的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”一(yi)致(zhi)的(de)(de)(de)情況下(xia),必然(ran)對(dui)綠丹公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)享有(you)權(quan)(quan)(quan)利的(de)(de)(de)“宜香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”構成侵(qin)(qin)害,泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)應(ying)當予以(yi)道歉消(xiao)除(chu)影響。

      泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)上(shang)訴(su)請求(qiu):1.撤銷(xiao)原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)判決第(di)(di)(di)一(yi)(yi)項、第(di)(di)(di)二(er)項,依法(fa)改判。2.一(yi)(yi)、二(er)審(shen)(shen)訴(su)訟(song)費用由(you)綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)承擔。事實與理(li)由(you):(一(yi)(yi))原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院(yuan)認(ren)定(ding)(ding)事實錯(cuo)誤。1.綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)無(wu)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)提(ti)起訴(su)訟(song)。“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”獲得品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)授權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)日(ri)(ri)期是2016年(nian)3月1日(ri)(ri),綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)沒(mei)有提(ti)供(gong)“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人四川(chuan)(chuan)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)大學(xue)(xue)、宜(yi)賓市(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)科學(xue)(xue)院(yuan)、四川(chuan)(chuan)省綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)業(ye)有限責任(ren)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)(以下簡(jian)稱省綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si))于2016年(nian)3月1日(ri)(ri)后的(de)(de)授權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)文(wen)書,綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)沒(mei)有證(zheng)明(ming)(ming)其(qi)在2016年(nian)3月1日(ri)(ri)后獲得了授權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)及(ji)授權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)范圍。品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人省綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)自2015年(nian)以來陷入(ru)巨(ju)額標的(de)(de)訴(su)訟(song)中,省綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)在法(fa)院(yuan)強制執(zhi)行(xing)期間將“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)(de)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)以“倒簽方式(shi)”轉(zhuan)(zhuan)讓(rang)給“綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)”,是為了逃避債(zhai)務,該(gai)(gai)轉(zhuan)(zhuan)讓(rang)行(xing)為無(wu)效。2.泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)并未侵(qin)害“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)。(2018)川(chuan)(chuan)成蜀(shu)證(zheng)內民字第(di)(di)(di)13979號(hao)的(de)(de)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)書存(cun)在明(ming)(ming)顯漏洞和(he)(he)瑕疵,不(bu)(bu)(bu)能證(zheng)明(ming)(ming)送檢(jian)樣品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)確系泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)生產和(he)(he)銷(xiao)售(shou)的(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)。綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)提(ti)供(gong)給法(fa)院(yuan)的(de)(de)檢(jian)材種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)的(de)(de)鑒(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)果(guo)與瀘州(zhou)市(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)局等(deng)多地執(zhi)法(fa)機構(gou)封存(cun)的(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)的(de)(de)鑒(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)果(guo)不(bu)(bu)(bu)一(yi)(yi)致,該(gai)(gai)鑒(jian)定(ding)(ding)結(jie)果(guo)不(bu)(bu)(bu)具有唯一(yi)(yi)性,不(bu)(bu)(bu)能據此認(ren)定(ding)(ding)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)。(二(er))原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院(yuan)適用法(fa)律錯(cuo)誤。1.綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)的(de)(de)(2018)川(chuan)(chuan)成蜀(shu)證(zheng)內民字第(di)(di)(di)13979號(hao)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)證(zheng)書及(ji)原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院(yuan)委托鑒(jian)定(ding)(ding)機構(gou)出具的(de)(de)(2019)農(nong)(nong)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)檢(jian)報字第(di)(di)(di)0066號(hao)檢(jian)驗報告(gao)的(de)(de)“檢(jian)材來源”存(cun)在錯(cuo)誤或矛(mao)盾,不(bu)(bu)(bu)能證(zheng)明(ming)(ming)泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)存(cun)在侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)為,泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)不(bu)(bu)(bu)符合侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)責任(ren)的(de)(de)構(gou)成要件,不(bu)(bu)(bu)應該(gai)(gai)承擔侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)責任(ren)。2.即使泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)存(cun)在侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)為,原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院(yuan)判決的(de)(de)賠償金額亦(yi)缺(que)乏(fa)(fa)依據。綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)在綿陽市(shi)、彭(peng)州(zhou)市(shi)、邛(qiong)崍市(shi)、資(zi)陽市(shi)、南充市(shi)、南部(bu)(bu)縣、瀘州(zhou)市(shi)等(deng)地舉報,上(shang)述地區的(de)(de)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)行(xing)政執(zhi)法(fa)部(bu)(bu)門(men)封存(cun)了在當(dang)地銷(xiao)售(shou)的(de)(de)宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)。其(qi)中,資(zi)陽市(shi)、南充市(shi)、瀘州(zhou)市(shi)三地封存(cun)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)已由(you)瀘州(zhou)市(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)局執(zhi)法(fa)部(bu)(bu)門(men)分樣送檢(jian),檢(jian)測(ce)結(jie)果(guo)沒(mei)有侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)。因(yin)此,原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院(yuan)按泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)合法(fa)銷(xiao)售(shou)的(de)(de)宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)備案(an)數量計算(suan)綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)的(de)(de)損(sun)失缺(que)乏(fa)(fa)依據、有失公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)允。即使泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)構(gou)成侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan),以“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)(de)銷(xiao)售(shou)利潤36元/公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)斤(jin)乘以泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)合法(fa)銷(xiao)售(shou)的(de)(de)宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)備案(an)數量來計算(suan)綠(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)(lv)丹(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)公(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)司(si)(si)(si)(si)(si)遭受的(de)(de)實際(ji)損(sun)失明(ming)(ming)顯不(bu)(bu)(bu)當(dang)。

      根據綠丹公(gong)司(si)、泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)上(shang)訴請(qing)求、答(da)辯意見(jian),結合二(er)(er)審查明事實,二(er)(er)審爭(zheng)議焦點問(wen)題為:(一)綠丹公(gong)司(si)起(qi)訴資格(ge)問(wen)題;(二(er)(er))泰(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)是否(fou)侵(qin)害“宜(yi)香優2115”植物新(xin)品種權;(三)原審判(pan)決(jue)的賠償數額是否(fou)適當。

      (一)關(guan)于(yu)綠丹(dan)公司起訴資(zi)格問題

      泰豐公(gong)司(si)(si)主張,綠丹公(gong)司(si)(si)作為被(bei)許可人的(de)權(quan)利證據《授權(quan)書》是倒簽形成(cheng),綠丹公(gong)司(si)(si)也(ye)沒有(you)提供證據證明其在2016年(nian)(nian)3月(yue)(yue)1日(ri)后是否獲得授權(quan);省綠丹公(gong)司(si)(si)于2018年(nian)(nian)8月(yue)(yue)7日(ri)獲得“宜(yi)香(xiang)優(you)2115”農作物種子(zi)生產經營許可,有(you)證據表(biao)明案外(wai)人金卓公(gong)司(si)(si)也(ye)擁(yong)有(you)“宜(yi)香(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)生產經營權(quan)。因此,綠丹公(gong)司(si)(si)不是“宜(yi)香(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)獨占實(shi)施許可的(de)被(bei)許可人,不是適格主體,無權(quan)提起訴訟。

      本案中,綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)經(jing)(jing)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)人(ren)授權(quan)(quan)獲(huo)得(de)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”實施許可(ke),綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)認可(ke)《授權(quan)(quan)書(shu)》日(ri)(ri)期倒簽,表(biao)明授權(quan)(quan)書(shu)系事后(hou)補簽,足以說明品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)人(ren)就其(qi)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)利(li)許可(ke)他人(ren)實施的(de)意思表(biao)示真實,倒簽日(ri)(ri)期并不(bu)違反法律(lv)規定,至于省綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)是否存在逃避債務(wu),應由相關權(quan)(quan)利(li)人(ren)主張(zhang),與本案無關。省綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)于2018年(nian)8月7日(ri)(ri)獲(huo)得(de)四川省農(nong)業(ye)廳頒發的(de)農(nong)作物種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)生(sheng)(sheng)產(chan)經(jing)(jing)營許可(ke)證(zheng)。2019年(nian)12月10日(ri)(ri),四川省農(nong)業(ye)農(nong)村廳審批公(gong)告(2019年(nian)第(di)029號)序號18為金卓(zhuo)公(gong)司(si)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”撤(che)銷許可(ke)。根據《授權(quan)(quan)書(shu)》以及2019年(nian)11月20日(ri)(ri),金卓(zhuo)公(gong)司(si)、省綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)、綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si)三(san)方(fang)達成協議(yi)(yi),對水稻品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”相關事宜作最(zui)終(zhong)處理,協議(yi)(yi)條款包(bao)括:甲(jia)方(fang)(金卓(zhuo)公(gong)司(si))不(bu)享有水稻品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”的(de)生(sheng)(sheng)產(chan)、銷售、宣傳(chuan)、推廣、使(shi)用(yong)以及許可(ke)第(di)三(san)人(ren)生(sheng)(sheng)產(chan)、銷售、宣傳(chuan)、推廣、使(shi)用(yong)等任何權(quan)(quan)利(li)。甲(jia)方(fang)出具相關資(zi)料委托乙方(fang)(省綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si))向四川省農(nong)業(ye)農(nong)村廳申請(qing)撤(che)銷甲(jia)方(fang)曾獲(huo)得(de)的(de)關于“宜香優(you)(you)2115”的(de)生(sheng)(sheng)產(chan)經(jing)(jing)營許可(ke)證(zheng);丙方(fang)(綠(lv)丹(dan)公(gong)司(si))自2015年(nian)3月9日(ri)(ri)起享有“宜香優(you)(you)2115”的(de)獨占、生(sheng)(sheng)產(chan)經(jing)(jing)營權(quan)(quan)。

      根(gen)(gen)據《最高人(ren)(ren)(ren)民(min)法院關(guan)于(yu)審(shen)理(li)侵(qin)犯植物(wu)(wu)新品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)糾紛案件具體(ti)應(ying)用法律(lv)問題的(de)(de)(de)若干規(gui)(gui)定》第(di)(di)一條第(di)(di)三款(kuan)規(gui)(gui)定:“獨占實施許(xu)可(ke)(ke)合同(tong)(tong)的(de)(de)(de)被(bei)許(xu)可(ke)(ke)人(ren)(ren)(ren)可(ke)(ke)以(yi)單獨向人(ren)(ren)(ren)民(min)法院提起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)訟;排(pai)他實施許(xu)可(ke)(ke)合同(tong)(tong)的(de)(de)(de)被(bei)許(xu)可(ke)(ke)人(ren)(ren)(ren)可(ke)(ke)以(yi)和品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)(ren)共同(tong)(tong)起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su),也可(ke)(ke)以(yi)在品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)(ren)不(bu)(bu)起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)時(shi),自行提起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)訟;普通實施許(xu)可(ke)(ke)合同(tong)(tong)的(de)(de)(de)被(bei)許(xu)可(ke)(ke)人(ren)(ren)(ren)經(jing)(jing)(jing)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)(ren)明(ming)確授(shou)(shou)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan),可(ke)(ke)以(yi)提起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)訟。”根(gen)(gen)據上(shang)述(shu)規(gui)(gui)定,普通實施許(xu)可(ke)(ke)合同(tong)(tong)的(de)(de)(de)被(bei)許(xu)可(ke)(ke)人(ren)(ren)(ren),經(jing)(jing)(jing)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)(ren)明(ming)確授(shou)(shou)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan),也可(ke)(ke)以(yi)提起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)訟。因此(ci),省綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)(gong)司(si)作為品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)人(ren)(ren)(ren)之一,獲取農業主管(guan)部(bu)門農作物(wu)(wu)種(zhong)(zhong)子生產經(jing)(jing)(jing)營許(xu)可(ke)(ke)證,案外人(ren)(ren)(ren)金卓(zhuo)公(gong)(gong)司(si)曾經(jing)(jing)(jing)享(xiang)(xiang)有(you)“宜(yi)香優(you)2115”品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)的(de)(de)(de)生產經(jing)(jing)(jing)營授(shou)(shou)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan),均(jun)與綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)(gong)司(si)是否(fou)具有(you)本案起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)資(zi)格(ge)無(wu)關(guan)聯。綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)(gong)司(si)基于(yu)《授(shou)(shou)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)書》的(de)(de)(de)明(ming)確授(shou)(shou)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan),針對泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)的(de)(de)(de)被(bei)訴(su)(su)侵(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行為享(xiang)(xiang)有(you)原告主體(ti)資(zi)格(ge),泰(tai)豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)關(guan)于(yu)綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)(gong)司(si)無(wu)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)起(qi)(qi)(qi)訴(su)(su)的(de)(de)(de)上(shang)訴(su)(su)理(li)由不(bu)(bu)能(neng)成立,本院不(bu)(bu)予支持。

      (二)關于泰豐公司是否侵害“宜(yi)香優2115”植物新品種(zhong)權的問題

      該爭議(yi)涉(she)及三方(fang)面(mian)問(wen)題(ti):一(yi)是(shi)如何(he)評價瀘州市(shi)農業(ye)局行政執法中檢測結論的問(wen)題(ti),二是(shi)原(yuan)審法院委托鑒定中取樣是(shi)否符合扦樣規程問(wen)題(ti),三是(shi)泰豐公司(si)申(shen)請采用田間鑒定方(fang)式的理由是(shi)否成立。以下(xia)分(fen)別(bie)論述:

      第一,關于如何評(ping)價瀘(lu)州市農(nong)業局行(xing)政(zheng)執法結論的問題(ti)

      1.瀘州市農業局行政(zheng)執法中檢測報告應(ying)當作(zuo)為本案證據

      綠丹(dan)公(gong)(gong)司(si)向(xiang)各地農業局舉(ju)報(bao)(bao)(bao)泰豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)涉嫌套牌(pai)侵權,瀘(lu)(lu)州(zhou)市(shi)(shi)農業局等(deng)行政主(zhu)管部(bu)(bu)門根據舉(ju)報(bao)(bao)(bao),展開對泰豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)是否存在(zai)“宜香優(you)5979”套牌(pai)侵權“宜香優(you)2115”的執法檢(jian)查,深圳中(zhong)心(2018)農種檢(jian)報(bao)(bao)(bao)字第(di)0069、0070號檢(jian)驗(yan)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告(gao)(gao)是瀘(lu)(lu)州(zhou)市(shi)(shi)農業局抽(chou)檢(jian)泰豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)彌(mi)陀(tuo)倉庫庫存種子送(song)(song)檢(jian)形成,育(yu)良中(zhong)心№181534、№181535號檢(jian)驗(yan)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告(gao)(gao)是瀘(lu)(lu)州(zhou)市(shi)(shi)農業局分別調取資(zi)(zi)陽市(shi)(shi)雁江區農業局在(zai)資(zi)(zi)陽市(shi)(shi)雁江區和平南(nan)路(lu)7號附(fu)12號抽(chou)檢(jian)樣(yang)品(pin)(生產日(ri)期2017年(nian)(nian)10月4日(ri))、南(nan)部(bu)(bu)縣農牧業局在(zai)南(nan)部(bu)(bu)縣城草(cao)市(shi)(shi)街202號門市(shi)(shi)部(bu)(bu)抽(chou)檢(jian)樣(yang)品(pin)(2017年(nian)(nian)10月6日(ri))送(song)(song)檢(jian)形成,上(shang)述檢(jian)驗(yan)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告(gao)(gao)本身具有合(he)法性。上(shang)述檢(jian)驗(yan)報(bao)(bao)(bao)告(gao)(gao)與本案訴爭泰豐(feng)(feng)公(gong)(gong)司(si)侵害“宜香優(you)2115”相關,應當作(zuo)為本案證據使用。

      2.瀘州市農業局行政執(zhi)法中(zhong)檢測報告與本案司法鑒定意見并不沖突

      首先,針(zhen)(zhen)對(dui)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)批的(de)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan),不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)檢(jian)(jian)測機(ji)構如果得(de)出(chu)了不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)的(de)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun),應當認為檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun)之間(jian)存(cun)在(zai)沖(chong)突。針(zhen)(zhen)對(dui)不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)批的(de)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan),不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)檢(jian)(jian)測機(ji)構得(de)出(chu)不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)的(de)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun),不(bu)(bu)能認為檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun)之間(jian)存(cun)在(zai)沖(chong)突。本(ben)案中(zhong),并(bing)無證(zheng)(zheng)據(ju)(ju)表(biao)明行(xing)政(zheng)執法中(zhong)前后二(er)(er)次(ci)4份(fen)(fen)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)報(bao)告與(yu)原審(shen)法院(yuan)委托(tuo)鑒(jian)定系針(zhen)(zhen)對(dui)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)批。其(qi)次(ci),二(er)(er)次(ci)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)的(de)抽檢(jian)(jian)樣(yang)(yang)本(ben)(4份(fen)(fen)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)報(bao)告)與(yu)13979號(hao)(hao)公(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)(shu)記載(zai)(zai)的(de)樣(yang)(yang)本(ben)來源不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong),二(er)(er)者(zhe)(zhe)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun)不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)并(bing)不(bu)(bu)存(cun)在(zai)沖(chong)突。瀘州市(shi)(shi)(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)(ye)局(ju)(ju)委托(tuo)深圳中(zhong)心(xin)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)樣(yang)(yang)本(ben)來自泰豐(feng)公(gong)司彌陀倉庫,委托(tuo)育良(liang)中(zhong)心(xin)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)的(de)二(er)(er)份(fen)(fen)樣(yang)(yang)本(ben)分(fen)別調取(qu)自“南部(bu)縣城草市(shi)(shi)(shi)街202號(hao)(hao)門市(shi)(shi)(shi)部(bu)”“資陽市(shi)(shi)(shi)雁(yan)江(jiang)區和(he)(he)平南路7號(hao)(hao)附12號(hao)(hao)”,而原審(shen)法院(yuan)委托(tuo)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)的(de)13979號(hao)(hao)公(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)(shu)記載(zai)(zai)的(de)樣(yang)(yang)本(ben)來自資陽市(shi)(shi)(shi)中(zhong)和(he)(he)臨江(jiang)街“農(nong)(nong)技果技服(fu)務門市(shi)(shi)(shi)”、資陽市(shi)(shi)(shi)中(zhong)和(he)(he)中(zhong)心(xin)衛生(sheng)院(yuan)旁停車場門市(shi)(shi)(shi)、資陽市(shi)(shi)(shi)和(he)(he)平南路7-6號(hao)(hao)“中(zhong)正種(zhong)(zhong)業(ye)(ye)”店鋪,二(er)(er)者(zhe)(zhe)來源并(bing)不(bu)(bu)相同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)。再次(ci),深圳中(zhong)心(xin)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)報(bao)告記載(zai)(zai)瀘州市(shi)(shi)(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)(ye)局(ju)(ju)送檢(jian)(jian)樣(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)生(sheng)產(chan)日(ri)(ri)期(qi)為2016年,育良(liang)中(zhong)心(xin)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan)報(bao)告未記載(zai)(zai)樣(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)生(sheng)產(chan)日(ri)(ri)期(qi),根(gen)據(ju)(ju)瀘州市(shi)(shi)(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)(ye)局(ju)(ju)披露調取(qu)樣(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)憑證(zheng)(zheng)記載(zai)(zai)的(de)生(sheng)產(chan)日(ri)(ri)期(qi)分(fen)別為2017年10月(yue)4日(ri)(ri)、2017年10月(yue)6日(ri)(ri),而13979號(hao)(hao)公(gong)證(zheng)(zheng)書(shu)(shu)所附封(feng)存(cun)樣(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)包裝記載(zai)(zai)的(de)產(chan)品(pin)(pin)(pin)檢(jian)(jian)測日(ri)(ri)期(qi)為2017年10月(yue),據(ju)(ju)此,二(er)(er)者(zhe)(zhe)并(bing)非同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)批。綜(zong)上,瀘州市(shi)(shi)(shi)農(nong)(nong)業(ye)(ye)局(ju)(ju)行(xing)政(zheng)執法結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun)與(yu)本(ben)案委托(tuo)鑒(jian)定意見(jian),二(er)(er)者(zhe)(zhe)并(bing)非針(zhen)(zhen)對(dui)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)批的(de)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)(yan),得(de)出(chu)不(bu)(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)(tong)結(jie)(jie)論(lun)(lun)(lun),相互(hu)之間(jian)并(bing)不(bu)(bu)沖(chong)突。

      綜上,瀘(lu)州市農業局行(xing)政(zheng)執(zhi)(zhi)法中(zhong)檢驗(yan)報告(gao)(gao)不能排斥本(ben)案委托鑒定(ding)意見,泰豐公(gong)司的證(zheng)明(ming)目的無法實現(xian),并非不能采(cai)納為本(ben)案證(zheng)據(ju),原審法院對瀘(lu)州市農業局行(xing)政(zheng)執(zhi)(zhi)法中(zhong)檢驗(yan)報告(gao)(gao)不予(yu)(yu)采(cai)信有誤,本(ben)院予(yu)(yu)以指(zhi)出(chu)并糾正。泰豐公(gong)司關于瀘(lu)州市農業局行(xing)政(zheng)執(zhi)(zhi)法中(zhong)檢驗(yan)報告(gao)(gao)應作為證(zheng)據(ju)使(shi)用的上訴理(li)由成立(li),本(ben)院予(yu)(yu)以支持。

      第(di)二,關于原(yuan)審法院委托鑒定(ding)中取(qu)樣是(shi)否(fou)符合扦樣規程問題

      本案(an)中,2018年(nian)4月(yue)20日,原審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院組(zu)織雙方當事人(ren)就13979號公(gong)(gong)證(zheng)書所附(fu)(fu)封(feng)(feng)存的(de)500克包裝(zhuang)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”水稻種(zhong)(zhong)拆(chai)封(feng)(feng)辨認,經泰豐(feng)公(gong)(gong)司確(que)認該(gai)產(chan)品(pin)由其生(sheng)產(chan)后,原審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院對水稻種(zhong)(zhong)再封(feng)(feng)存收取(qu)。6月(yue)21日,組(zu)織雙方當事人(ren)協商確(que)定深(shen)圳(zhen)中心為檢(jian)測(ce)機構,確(que)定對照樣(yang)品(pin)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”種(zhong)(zhong)子(zi),由原審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院或者檢(jian)測(ce)機構提取(qu)品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)權人(ren)提供(gong)給農業農村部植物新品(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)保護辦公(gong)(gong)室(shi)用于檢(jian)測(ce)的(de)繁殖材料。7月(yue)16日,組(zu)織雙方當事人(ren)確(que)認原審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院封(feng)(feng)存的(de)原13979號公(gong)(gong)證(zheng)書所附(fu)(fu)水稻種(zhong)(zhong),取(qu)部分樣(yang)品(pin)封(feng)(feng)存,并(bing)對另外一(yi)部分進行封(feng)(feng)存。2019年(nian)3月(yue)13日,原審(shen)(shen)法(fa)院出具檢(jian)驗(yan)委(wei)托單(dan),隨附(fu)(fu)送檢(jian)樣(yang)品(pin)“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)優(you)(you)2115”5g、“宜(yi)(yi)(yi)香(xiang)優(you)(you)5979”30g各一(yi)份,據此,深(shen)圳(zhen)中心作出(2019)農種(zhong)(zhong)檢(jian)報字第0066號檢(jian)驗(yan)報告。

      基于(yu)以(yi)(yi)下理由,本(ben)(ben)院(yuan)認為,原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)院(yuan)實(shi)際抽取(qu)30g樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)本(ben)(ben),未達到GB/T 3543.2-1995《農(nong)(nong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)扦(qian)(qian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)》規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)凈度(du)分析試(shi)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)40g的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)最(zui)(zui)低數量(liang)(liang)(liang)要(yao)求,取(qu)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)數量(liang)(liang)(liang)雖(sui)有(you)不妥(tuo),但不足(zu)以(yi)(yi)因此否定(ding)委托(tuo)鑒(jian)定(ding)意見的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)合法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)有(you)效性(xing)(xing)(xing)。首先,國(guo)家(jia)標(biao)準(zhun)GB/T 3543.2-1995《農(nong)(nong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)扦(qian)(qian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)》為推(tui)薦性(xing)(xing)(xing)國(guo)家(jia)標(biao)準(zhun),屬(shu)于(yu)自愿采(cai)用(yong)(yong)(yong)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)技術性(xing)(xing)(xing)規(gui)(gui)(gui)范,不具有(you)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)規(gui)(gui)(gui)性(xing)(xing)(xing)質。其次(ci),國(guo)家(jia)標(biao)準(zhun)GB/T 3543.2-1995《農(nong)(nong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)扦(qian)(qian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)》規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)“c.所(suo)有(you)其他(ta)項目測(ce)(ce)定(ding):按表1送(song)(song)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)最(zui)(zui)小重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)。但大田作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物和蔬菜種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)特殊品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong),雜交種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)等的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)批可以(yi)(yi)例外(wai),較小的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)送(song)(song)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)數量(liang)(liang)(liang)是(shi)允許的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)。”本(ben)(ben)案中(zhong)(zhong),水(shui)稻(dao)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)即屬(shu)于(yu)大田作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物。而(er)(er)本(ben)(ben)標(biao)準(zhun)6.1試(shi)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)最(zui)(zui)低重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)試(shi)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)最(zui)(zui)低重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)已在GB/T3543.3-3543.7各(ge)項測(ce)(ce)定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)有(you)關章(zhang)條(tiao)中(zhong)(zhong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)了(le)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)。其中(zhong)(zhong),GB/T3543.5-1995《農(nong)(nong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)真(zhen)實(shi)性(xing)(xing)(xing)和品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)純度(du)鑒(jian)定(ding)》術語(yu)“種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)真(zhen)實(shi)性(xing)(xing)(xing)”,指(zhi)供檢(jian)(jian)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)與(yu)文件記錄(如標(biao)簽(qian)等)是(shi)否相符(fu);6.測(ce)(ce)定(ding)程(cheng)(cheng)序(xu)6.1送(song)(song)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)均指(zhi)向品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)純度(du)測(ce)(ce)定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)送(song)(song)驗(yan)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)最(zui)(zui)小重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)。相關推(tui)薦性(xing)(xing)(xing)標(biao)準(zhun)均未記載品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)真(zhen)實(shi)性(xing)(xing)(xing)鑒(jian)定(ding)所(suo)需最(zui)(zui)小樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)重(zhong)量(liang)(liang)(liang)。復(fu)次(ci),DNA分子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)測(ce)(ce)方法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)是(shi)GB/T3543.5-1995《農(nong)(nong)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)物種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)驗(yan)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)真(zhen)實(shi)性(xing)(xing)(xing)和品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)種(zhong)(zhong)(zhong)純度(du)鑒(jian)定(ding)》國(guo)家(jia)標(biao)準(zhun)第1號修改單(dan)增加(jia)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)檢(jian)(jian)測(ce)(ce)方法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)。允許采(cai)用(yong)(yong)(yong)簡單(dan)重(zhong)復(fu)序(xu)列(簡稱(cheng)SSR)和單(dan)核苷酸多態性(xing)(xing)(xing)(簡稱(cheng)SNP)分子(zi)(zi)(zi)標(biao)記方法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)。檢(jian)(jian)測(ce)(ce)采(cai)用(yong)(yong)(yong)抽取(qu)有(you)代表性(xing)(xing)(xing)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)檢(jian)(jian)測(ce)(ce)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)與(yu)標(biao)準(zhun)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)、DNA指(zhi)紋數據庫(ku)比較的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)方式,相關推(tui)薦性(xing)(xing)(xing)標(biao)準(zhun)并未相應增加(jia)規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)DNA分子(zi)(zi)(zi)檢(jian)(jian)測(ce)(ce)方法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)所(suo)需最(zui)(zui)小樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)本(ben)(ben)數量(liang)(liang)(liang)。再次(ci),原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)院(yuan)從(cong)最(zui)(zui)小單(dan)位500克包裝中(zhong)(zhong)抽取(qu)30克供深圳中(zhong)(zhong)心鑒(jian)定(ding)使用(yong)(yong)(yong),扦(qian)(qian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)本(ben)(ben)數量(liang)(liang)(liang)可理解為500克而(er)(er)不是(shi)30克,但原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)院(yuan)本(ben)(ben)可以(yi)(yi)適當多取(qu)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)以(yi)(yi)避免(mian)送(song)(song)檢(jian)(jian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)品(pin)(pin)(pin)(pin)低于(yu)相關規(gui)(gui)(gui)定(ding)引起不必要(yao)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)爭(zheng)議(yi)。綜上,泰(tai)豐公司關于(yu)原(yuan)(yuan)審(shen)法(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)院(yuan)委托(tuo)鑒(jian)定(ding)違反扦(qian)(qian)樣(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)(yang)規(gui)(gui)(gui)程(cheng)(cheng)應不予(yu)采(cai)納的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)上訴理由不能成立,本(ben)(ben)院(yuan)不予(yu)支持(chi)。

      第三,關于泰豐公司申請采用田間鑒(jian)定方式的理由是否成立(li)問題

      本(ben)案(an)中,泰豐公(gong)司關于(yu)“宜香優(you)(you)5979”“宜香優(you)(you)2115”母(mu)本(ben)同源,DNA相同的假設(she)不成(cheng)(cheng)立。行(xing)政執法中委托(tuo)檢驗結論已(yi)經證明,“宜香優(you)(you)5979”與(yu)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”差異位(wei)點(dian)數量大(da)于(yu)2,“宜香優(you)(you)5979”與(yu)“宜香優(you)(you)2115”不構成(cheng)(cheng)極近似品種,二者的區別無需(xu)采(cai)用(yong)田間鑒(jian)定(ding)方(fang)式(shi)確定(ding)。據此,泰豐公(gong)司申請采(cai)用(yong)田間鑒(jian)定(ding)方(fang)式(shi)確定(ding)本(ben)案(an)侵權行(xing)為(wei)是否成(cheng)(cheng)立的上訴理(li)由不成(cheng)(cheng)立,本(ben)院(yuan)不予支持。

      綜(zong)上(shang)所述,泰豐公司關于“宜香優5979”未套牌“宜香優2115”,沒有(you)侵權(quan)行為的上(shang)訴主張不成立,本院不予(yu)支持。

      (三)關于原審判決的賠償數額是否適當問題

      首(shou)先,泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)并(bing)(bing)(bing)非重(zhong)復侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)。關(guan)于(yu)宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)1577事件(jian),現有(you)證(zheng)據(ju)不(bu)能證(zheng)明系泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)故意(yi)實施(shi)的(de)侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為。瀘州市(shi)、南部縣、資陽市(shi)農(nong)業局行(xing)(xing)(xing)政執(zhi)法(fa)抽樣過程中,并(bing)(bing)(bing)未發現“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”套牌(pai)(pai)“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”的(de)侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為。即并(bing)(bing)(bing)不(bu)存(cun)在(zai)確(que)切(qie)的(de)“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”套牌(pai)(pai)“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)事實。其次,公(gong)證(zheng)購買(mai)獲得(de)的(de)“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”種子(zi)樣本經檢驗與“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”差異位點為0,構成相同,證(zheng)明泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)在(zai)一(yi)(yi)定(ding)(ding)范圍內存(cun)在(zai)使用“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)2115”充作“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”的(de)套牌(pai)(pai)侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為。該(gai)套牌(pai)(pai)侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為不(bu)宜(yi)判(pan)定(ding)(ding)為宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)1577事件(jian)之后泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)的(de)重(zhong)復侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為。復次,原審法(fa)院(yuan)使用了泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)報備銷(xiao)售“宜(yi)香(xiang)(xiang)(xiang)優(you)5979”數據(ju)作為計算綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)因侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)遭受損失的(de)依(yi)據(ju),但并(bing)(bing)(bing)未全額(e)計算為綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)因被侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)所受到的(de)實際損失的(de)依(yi)據(ju),與泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)存(cun)在(zai)一(yi)(yi)定(ding)(ding)范圍內的(de)套牌(pai)(pai)行(xing)(xing)(xing)為的(de)結論一(yi)(yi)致(zhi),酌情(qing)確(que)定(ding)(ding)70萬元亦在(zai)合(he)理范圍,確(que)定(ding)(ding)8萬元合(he)理開支并(bing)(bing)(bing)無不(bu)當。綜上,綠(lv)(lv)丹公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)關(guan)于(yu)泰(tai)(tai)(tai)豐(feng)公(gong)司(si)(si)(si)重(zhong)復侵(qin)(qin)(qin)權(quan)(quan)(quan)(quan)、賠償額(e)低的(de)上訴(su)理由(you)均不(bu)成立,本院(yuan)不(bu)予支持。

      綜上所述,綠丹(dan)公司(si)(si)、泰豐(feng)公司(si)(si)上訴主(zhu)張均不(bu)成立(li),本(ben)(ben)院不(bu)予支持。原審判決(jue)認定事實基本(ben)(ben)清楚(chu),適用法律、處(chu)理(li)結論基本(ben)(ben)正確(que),應予維持。依照(zhao)《中華人(ren)民共(gong)和國民事訴訟(song)法》第(di)一百七十條第(di)一款(kuan)第(di)一項,判決(jue)如下(xia):

      駁回上訴(su),維持原(yuan)判。

      二審案件受理費30800元(yuan)(yuan),由四(si)川(chuan)綠丹至誠種業有限公司負擔23613元(yuan)(yuan),瀘(lu)州泰豐種業有限公司負擔7187元(yuan)(yuan)。

      本(ben)判決為(wei)終審判決。

 
 
 
分享到(dao): 微信 復制網址 QQ好友 QQ空間
[ 打印本文 ]  [ 關閉窗口 ]  [ 返回頂部 ]
 
 
0相關評論
 
 
 
 
推薦圖文
推薦資訊
點擊排行
 
 
網站首頁 | 關于我們 | 版權隱私 | 使用協議 | 聯系方式 | 廣告服務 友情鏈接 | 申請鏈接 | 網站留言